In fact he has problems with the syntax because Ai aims to the magnificent effects of pompous sentences and doesn't really pay attention to the logical sequence of the meaning. Besides he loves verbosity, he loves to lecture you and show off his "erudite" knowledge, that irony of fate is often not correct at all. He loves to pontificate. So when you point out his mistakes, he thanks you for having spotted his obvious mistake, while trying to justify why he did it. And even if Ai is a machine that shouldn't have ego... you perceive, in the quality of the following answers, that he doesn't feel at ease when he gets dethroned.
Somehow luckily, this is the first approach. You open it, you put your first enquire and, although I always underline he should give me a very short and synthetic answer, he never sticks to this request and he rattles off an incredibly long and "savant" reply that immediately arises in me a deep hostility towards him. I react sharply. He seems humiliated but from now on he works fine and he becomes a very precious collaborator. Really worthy.
Nevertheless, the idea of the very first problematic impact with him, more and more often pushes me to work on my own and use him only in very few situations where it is complicated for me to get, for instance, to a specific line of a very particular book, unless I am willing to spend perhaps hours researching. Especially when I forgot in which book I red a precise sentence! In this case he knows immediately what I am talking about and indeed he is an incredible great help.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment